The discourse of intolerance and extremism; The case of Wilders as study model

Her own humanity in peaceful coexistence construction over the course of its existence .. But that process did not prejudice the cases coincided with the values of this speech when language appears militancy and extremism. The basic principle of human life to take all the positive support rations and give opportunities for calm and stability .. This is emphasized by the religions and laws and laws, as we read in the sacred text "and created you into nations and tribes to know each other" .. In the field of language interaction and communication came to the verse says: "And argue with the way that is better" ..

Here we confront today's storms militancy and extremism takes marched relations between our peoples .. Where they exercise elements of the few small groups and narrow actions; taking advantage of the laws of public freedoms and opportunities and wide range of expression in order to make the letters fall between the chaos and lack of understanding of others and inciting hatred, racism and call for an infant to meet the dialogues and positive interaction between diverse cultures of multiple human ...

Has surfaced recently in a speech at a number of European countries made treatments, expressive aesthetic and intellectual forms of drawings and writings that can only be calculated within the framework of extremism on the one hand, racism and incitement to hostility and address the contradictions between the negative cultures .. It is expected the emergence of a movie last experience from a personal perspective to the sanctities of Islamic religious!

It was the reaction to the speech of wisdom and logic in the Pacific mental response in dealing with the incident objectively eliminate negative effects on the human crises to avoid individual behavior or policy, an extremist group is narrow, and the emotional responses are solely the anger and falling into the trap of expressions of militancy and extremism, to that person or for that group where the goal is to drag the parties to a collision of the highest shipments tension ..

At the time we still did not address the after effects of the problem of the cartoons published in Denmark is not ready to view in the Netherlands, for the same issue a letter of pouring fuel in the fire of passion and hard speeches and cutting through positive dialogue between cultures and within human societies based on diversity, pluralism and the rejection of racism and language hatred ...

We have used the European Community and from the Netherlands to ensure freedom of expression and respect for others and peaceful coexistence of construction, and those are the norm. However, this did not prevent individual cases of the emergence of the values of racism and fascism, including paying for the emergence of hatred and then to get reactions and collisions ...

In order to finish this problem should be for all parties to shoulder their responsibilities in addressing racial hate speech whenever several different groups interacted in a positive cultural roots narrowed area of the arguments and excuses of the elements that refuse to such abuse of civilization civilized between these groups ...

The dialogue and interaction takes place between peoples and nations with different systems on the basis of equality and non-interference and mutual interests and relations of peaceful coexistence .. It is within the state between indigenous communities and between communities and groups that settled across the phenomena of migration and stability for various reasons and motives ..

It is true that the process of dialogue between East and West and between Islam and Christianity, Judaism and other religions is still obsessed with the manifestations of chaos and discontinuity and interruptions in the light of the conflict (interests) and the ambitions of local authorities do not have diplomatic common sense, but it is more correct to monitor the emergence of these intersections and contradictions in contemporary societies and specifically here of modern European ...

It is well known that Europe received [especially in recent decades] a large volume of African immigrants, including Asians and Arabs and Muslims, which led to the existence of small communities are not merged after the birth of more than one generation to form a new European society based on pluralism and cultural diversity in the sources ...

It was not the state of interaction and integration easy or free of the complexities and problems, especially with the presence of forces arising from the rejection of the renewed reception of new immigrants outside the capabilities of those countries or those that have not resented the acceptance of multiculturalism ...

It is required to reassure the atmosphere of interaction and integration in a calm and correct sanitary party bears the responsibility of the interaction of indigenous communities and hence the cases of positive interdependence to ensure that all parties to set aside the results of abuse or violations and lack of respect for the other, or contempt and disregard by the result to conflict can not be estimated in its findings and Mdyatea levels of unforeseen and long ..

 Let us take an example of what is happening today in the Netherlands on not Mr. Geert Wilders controversial [before the shows] Mr. Wilders himself depends continuously on the inflammatory remarks and sharp and to use the language of radical extremist in his speech ..

Mr Wilders has gone too far in its approach, which includes exposure to the sanctities of Muslims, which had resulted in complications and reactions of some may not be so quiet and extremism in the handling may not Nfjo extremists on the other, which result in serious adverse reactions that could victimize nothing to do with the disposal of Wilders and others ...

The language of the Wilders challenge of peaceful coexistence in the case of Dutch society and blocks the path to a peaceful dialogue between the community groups belonging to different cultures, roots, because the performance of Wilders features beyond those provided by the freedom of expression does not include any way of underestimating the acceptance of others, or his disdain and contempt through the discourse of racism chauvinist and fascist mechanisms in dealing with that other ...

The elements of Dutch society and the wider Alothbt are those that are moving towards the positive interaction and dialogue, and the sober logic of constructive relations of complementarity and the recognition of cultural diversity and pluralism in society; and here we have found all levels of society has moved to address the matter with:

1. Government is the person of Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende had an active political and media to express the position that the refusal to disregard religious groups and beliefs all Mhesra to the firm stance on respect for everyone and to ensure their freedoms. Participated, including several ministers and ministers of justice and internal and external situation counselors Vlders is not showing the film and reflect on the consequences of it ...

2. Recorded the political elite and leaders and personalities known its position through a statement they called a "diagnosis and constructive" .. And it claims the union leader known Doklp Terpstra movement stands contrario Wilders extremist positions and calls for tolerance, coexistence and substantive dialogue region, pointing out that: "The Netherlands Bhacrha nearly smothered in a narrow range of intolerance and indifference," he said about 58 of the signatories in their statement, "Fortunately, we live in a country where everyone can say whatever they want. However, this freedom should not be misused to insult the others, it will lead to a solution but to make it worse, a walk in a dead end "..

3. It also moved civil society groups to raise more than a case against Mr. Vlders as in the case filed by lawyer Gerard Spong, along with dozens of students ..

4. And popular, especially by communities followed a number of activities and attitudes. The remarks represented a former deputy from the green movement, left-wing Mr. Mohamed Raba important position when he called for calm and wisdom and objectivity in the peaceful and legal response to the children of Moroccan-Dutch community (about 200 organizations and Hmaip) .. And work to prosecute Wilders legal and expression of positions away from the chaos and emotion ...

 

  Dealing with the problem posed by the individual person should not be expanded to take in nature amplification patients that does not resolve or answer correctly responded to the arguments of Mr. Wilders .. Since any response edgy jerky means a confirmation of the proposals of Wilders and his film The mean response minded, careful reflection of the real face of the moderate Muslims in their religion as "religion is the center" and "exaggeration in religion" ...

Just as we do not find the chaos and emotion valid defense or right of true belief and the right to respect as well as we do not find that extremism Palmatty year of its existence can end extreme responses .. Instead of termination or dissolution of the resulting responses will increase extreme fire situation, and deepen the wounds of human and more complicated ...

 

And there is no reason not to respond to severe in those acts within the sphere of violence and sabotage and destruction or in the sanctions and collective responses are exaggerated, as is the threat of punishment for the people and Government of the Netherlands as the Netherlands is not Wilders has been confirmed clearly the difference between the positions of the Government and its ministers and the parties and the position of Wilders and clearly shows the position of elites and political leaders and social as well as Dutchmen and popular attitudes that did not accept or allow the other to waive whatever ... How and why unharmed by the misdeed of another? But how can we allow the hand to punish the people lost in the extremists?

Not justify this situation upside down when the situation of our people are punished because of extremists among us?

The real problem is not in the film is an extremist individual, personal motive or objectives, but in the exaggerated and convulsive Walrdod extreme size limit broader inflation in granting the individual greater opportunities to distort the religious belief and believers in the provision of opportunities arise for the collision which all citizens desire Segerh from innocent victims as a result of interactions serious negative responses convulsive ..

It should not take for granted today, including the statements of ammunition to some public figures from the representatives of Muslims in the Netherlands and abroad, such as "all the holy sacrifice" and "only the Prophet (PBUH) .." And inflammatory statements like excited and even more serious degree of the comments of one of the countries of the Islamic Mufti [Mufti of Syria's remarks in Brussels] is fueling things are not in those countries according to [bring about all the interactions may lead to attacks on safe, guests have nothing to do Pfilders, values and actions], but reflected to the citizens of the Netherlands from communities who are induced to enter these statements in the behavior of the activities and responses of undesirable consequences ..

 

The origin in the diets of peoples and religious groups, lies in the collaboration and Aon Altaiic and peaceful and all depart from that dealt with human wisdom and not to submit that the relationships for earthquakes, sabotage or even lukewarm .. It can not be the exception to this rule of origin to eliminate the right thing in relations or disrupt the wisdom in the management of things ...

Well I did manage, and the Cairo Film Festival to accept the movie Netherlands to participate after reading the situation according to what it really is not on according to the logic of Mr. Wilders and the extremists of his part and others to expressions of racial chauvinist fascist ...

 

And for the wisdom and advice to say: do not fight extremism with extremism .. The mainstay of human diets positive interaction and peaceful coexistence and respect for the freedoms which include respect for others and refuses to disdain and contempt ... The solution in the case of the extremists in any country lies in the accountability of judicial and subjected to the authority of the law to stop the negative repercussions of their outrageous and dangerous ..

 

This is an invitation to address together to extremism and to prevent any negative repercussions in the friendly relations of constructive all of us, a call directed to the associations and organizations in our communities and our embassies in the Netherlands and Europe to be the best ambassador of the deepest constructive and positive relations in order not to wait for events and stands idly by .. As is an invitation to representatives of our peoples and our countries in order not to pour fuel on the fire of hatred that he wants members of the low-minded and thinking that light it as in the example Wilders ...

Dr. Tayseer Abdul-Jabbar Alusi

Academic and political analyst \ human rights activist

05 \ 03 \ 2008

tayseer54@hotmail.com